View previous topic::View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:23 pm文章主题:推倒分析和软件… |
|
|
---Message Re-Processed to Fit a Thread.--- Dear Dr Jain, boss u are right, pl bear with me when i complain-- where is the time, money and client worth investing where our own Structural Association members are quoting shockingly low prices(can u beat it--70p per sq ft including wetting from IIT--dont worry, IIT Delhi!) ab batao, kya maine galat kaha? P.s.I met Alpa (for the first time!) in Bangalore where I presented my first ever paper on EQ engg based on IS Codes with Case studies.I actally spoke impromptu for sixty odd minutes before showing powerpoint for the rest half an hour and the whole thing put together was something of a hit,quite unexpectedly.Many people knew about SEFI were aware of my frequent comments, the rest will soon become members(thanks to my address and of course Alpas v dynamic paper the next day).I also told them abt Nicee.org and everyone quite liked the way SEFI has been managed so far and were also quite enthusiastic abt the national test. bye for now and regards Sangeeta ----- Original Message ----- Message From To: Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 7:20 PM Subject: Push over analysis and softwares...
Quote: |
Dear Amit, Vipul, Sangeeta and others:
The push over analysis is not such a big deal in terms of software. For instance, the SAP2000 is one of the well-respected software that also has good capabilities for push over analysis. After the Gujarat earthquake on my suggestion, the firm CSI had agreed to provide this software at a fraction of their regular price to Indian engineers and many colleagues in the country indeed bought the software.
The main thing is:
a) Push over analysis require considerable amount of understanding of the subject by the analyst. A large numer of assumptions are needed, and member response curves are to be provided to the programme before it can analyze. Hence, it is really a question about Indian structural firms investing on the training of their engineers. My own impressions are that many very good firms in India unfortunately do not consider training to be useful. This could be because they do not realise the need for training because they are doing roaring business anyway, or it could be that the training quality in our country leaves much to be desired. It is a universal fact that in the name of training workshops, anything goes.
b) As of now, one does not expect push over analysis to be used for design of new buildings; certainly not the ordinary buildings. However, it is emerging as a very important tool for assessment of safety of existing buildings and for retrofitting of the same. Unfortunately, serious efforts by Indian structural firms towards retrofitting jobs have been lacking: this is evident in Gujarat where a major opportunity has been lost after the 2001 earthquake for some good retrofitting work. In fact, I am told that in some of the large contracts by the Govt of Gujarat, some large structural firms otherwise well respected have given rather simplistic and general recommendations for retrofitting of buildings without backing these with any calculations or design philosophy.
My recommendation is that we all should collectively decide to improve the state of the practice and for that we need to invest in training of our people. As we do better quality of work, it will be possible to charge more money for our services (I know Sangeeta will complain that clients are not willing to pay!).
Best regards,
Sudhir
|
Quote: |
Quote: |
Quote: |
Quote: |
Structural Engineers Forum of
|
India
|
|
|
---------------------------------
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:23 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
skjain@iitk.ac.inwrote: Dear Sangeeta:
We had a lot of discussions on the state of structural engineering in the August 2002 workshop organized by NICEE and I will restrain from writing too much on this issue. However, I cannot resist from stating the following:
a) Consultants are in the "knowledge business". Improving the product, that is "knowledge and skills", has to be unconditional: regardless of what someone pays for services, you have to strive to give the best possible services.
b) In view of the above, investment in capacity building of your own firm is the best way to not only grow professionally but also to charge higher rates for your services.
在全球经济b)印度的工程师无法生存my by using the arguments such as client is not paying, architects do not pay....They must be as good, or better, as their peers elsewhere.
c) While there may be consultants charging Rs 0.70 per sq. feet, I am sure there are other consultants who are charging Rs 7.00 per sq feet. One has to decide one's own placement in the profession. Having superior services is the best way to go up in the value chain.
I will close here and hope that SEFI members in general and SEFI as a forum does not take the pessimistic view that we cannot improve since our fees is low.
Best regards,
Sudhir Jain
sdec@bol.net.in wrote:
Quote: |
Dear Dr Jain, boss u are right, pl bear with me when i complain-- where is the time, money and client worth investing where our own Structural Association members are quoting shockingly low prices(can u beat it--70p per sq ft including wetting from IIT--dont worry, IIT Delhi!) ab batao, kya maine galat kaha? P.s.I met Alpa (for the first time!) in Bangalore where I presented my first ever paper on EQ engg based on IS Codes with Case studies.I actally spoke impromptu for sixty odd minutes before showing powerpoint for the rest half an hour and the whole thing put together was something of a hit,quite unexpectedly.Many people knew about SEFI were aware of my frequent comments, the rest will soon become members(thanks to my address and of course Alpas v dynamic paper the next day).I also told them abt Nicee.org and everyone quite liked the way SEFI has been managed so far and were also quite enthusiastic abt the national test. bye for now and regards Sangeeta ----- Original Message ----- Message From To: Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 7:20 PM Subject: Push over analysis and softwares...
Quote: |
Dear Amit, Vipul, Sangeeta and others:
The push over analysis is not such a big deal in terms of software. For instance, the SAP2000 is one of the well-respected software that also has good capabilities for push over analysis. After the Gujarat earthquake on my suggestion, the firm CSI had agreed to provide this software at a fraction of their regular price to Indian engineers and many colleagues in the country indeed bought the software. sdec@bol.net.in wrote:
|
|
Quote: |
Quote: |
Quote: |
----- Original Message ----- Message From To: Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:00 AM Subject: Reply to Mr. Sikandar Hayat Siddiqi 's letter dated 29th October 2004
Quote: |
I wish to share Mr. Sikandar Hayat Siddiqi 's deep
Quote: |
concern over the neglect of designing structures with regard to
|
Routine
Quote: |
Design of Earthquake Resistant Structures. But a Performance Based Seismic Evaluation ,Push Over Analysis ( Non linear
Analysis) & other sophisticated methods are easier said
|
than done
Quote: |
because of lack of resources etc.
Firstly the capability of the average practicing structural
|
engineers &
Quote: |
顾问在评估最终的地震帽acities & going
|
for a
Quote: |
non linear analysis is very limited because a major portion of
|
these
Quote: |
topics are been dealt only at the research level & not well
|
established
Quote: |
Secondly the above said analysis will require very powerful &
|
costly
Quote: |
softwares beyond the reach of most of the organizations. The most commonly & popular software of structural engineering software in
|
India
Quote: |
seems to be STAAD PRO ,but how many people have really used it for
|
non
Quote: |
linear analysis is a big question.
Thirdly & probably the most important factor is that the client
|
is not
Quote: |
willing to give the time which will be required for the kind of
|
analysis
Quote: |
you are have suggested.
I feel as the awareness to seismic hazard & seismic risk
|
increases over
Quote: |
the years within the engineering community & also the nation as a
|
whole
Quote: |
the above methods of analysis shall find their true place.
With regards
Amit Dutt
Structural Engineer
Structural Engineers Forum of
|
India
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:23 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
skjain@iitk.ac.inwrote: Dear Sangeeta:
We had a lot of discussions on the state of structural engineering in the August 2002 workshop organized by NICEE and I will restrain from writing too much on this issue. However, I cannot resist from stating the following:
a) Consultants are in the knowledge business. Improving the product, that is knowledge and skills, has to be unconditional: regardless of what someone pays for services, you have to strive to give the best possible services.
b) In view of the above, investment in capacity building of your own firm is the best way to not only grow professionally but also to charge higher rates for your services.
在全球经济b)印度的工程师无法生存my by using the arguments such as client is not paying, architects do not pay....They must be as good, or better, as their peers elsewhere.
c) While there may be consultants charging Rs 0.70 per sq. feet, I am sure there are other consultants who are charging Rs 7.00 per sq feet. One has to decide one ;s own placement in the profession. Having superior services is the best way to go up in the value chain.
I will close here and hope that SEFI members in general and SEFI as a forum does not take the pessimistic view that we cannot improve since our fees is low.
Best regards,
Sudhir Jain
sdec@bol.net.in wrote:
Dear Dr Jain, boss u are right, pl bear with me when i complain-- where is the time, money and client worth investing where our own Structural Association members are quoting shockingly low prices(can u beat it--70p per sq ft including wetting from IIT--dont worry, IIT Delhi!) ab batao, kya maine galat kaha? P.s.I met Alpa (for the first time!) in Bangalore where I presented my first ever paper on EQ engg based on IS Codes with Case studies.I actally spoke impromptu for sixty odd minutes before showing powerpoint for the rest half an hour and the whole thing put together was something of a hit,quite unexpectedly.Many people knew about SEFI were aware of my frequent comments, the rest will soon become members(thanks to my address and of course Alpas v dynamic paper the next day).I also told them abt Nicee.org and everyone quite liked the way SEFI has been managed so far and were also quite enthusiastic abt the national test. bye for now and regards Sangeeta ----- Original Message ----- Message From To: Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 7:20 PM Subject: Push over analysis and softwares...
Dear Amit, Vipul, Sangeeta and others:
The push over analysis is not such a big deal in terms of software. For instance, the SAP2000 is one of the well-respected software that also has good capabilities for push over analysis. After the Gujarat earthquake on my suggestion, the firm CSI had agreed to provide this software at a fraction of their regular price to Indian engineers and many colleagues in the country indeed bought the software. sdec@bol.net.in wrote:
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:24 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
A R Chandrasekaran
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:24 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
Robert.Nicolson@Subsea7.comwrote: In Britain, we have the ICE, IStructE, and the IMechE. What are the equivalent Institutes, in France, and Germany ?
The website addresses would be nice, if someone, can help me.
Thanks, Rob.
---------------------------------
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:25 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
To : sikandarsiddiqi @yahoo.com
Sent : Mon Dec 6 23:49:47 2004
Subject : Help needed
ajjjay2001@yahoo.com wrote: Dear friends,
I'm a new member to this group. As a part of my work in dynamic analysis I am in urgent need of a C-code for eigen value extraction by subspace iteration technique. If anybody is having the same please send it to me. I do want details about sites having downloadable FEM source codes.
My Id:ajjjay2001@yahoo.co.in
With Regards Ajay
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.
---------------------------------
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:25 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
U think the supporters sign without asking any question & the IEI accepts the application without any evidence of the experiences
U think that Engineers Mobility Forum under WTO/Washington Accord has given provisional membership to IEI for considering nothing about the membership qualities
U think if PE of US which is considered only after an experience of 4 years only is superior for it is under government control
U think that IEI is not related to the government & just a private organization
U think that ECI shall give u a license under the government which is impossible for the time being as it is only a registered society & shall remain so for many more years to come for the proposed Act is in its entirety is unconstitutional & I am definitely going to say �not to be� Rajya Sabha when it comes into the house for public consideration
Your aforesaid accusations about IEI & its members being misjudged & of no quality really at least hurt me & shall affect thousands more
I do not understand on what basis u are considering US PE superior I have seen many US PEs & I do know about their abilities & even about the UL Engineers
Unfortunately u are also not clear about the meaning of IEI Charter as many thousands are not
This is the fact that u too are away from the working knowledge of Indian legal System
There is no question that I fear to appear for an examination or interview by any council but it is also not understandable that a person of your stature talk no values of practical experience. Every day there is interview. Every
Operation is an interview. Every solution to an engineering problem is an answer. Every approval to your solution or proposal is an answer & award.
In field we have to raise question ourselves & find answers to those question & sooner or later success comes. What then u talk about that experience is no consideration. U think only theoretical formula knowing is the competencies. Field engineering is a big class of the world university & I am proud to learn in the field gaining enough professional development & earning interface & interaction capacities with innumerable cross section of the international professionals. I least care what US PE is & I consider myself superior to those.
Since u are not able to evaluate the IEI Charter Legal status which is a part of the government, I am sorry that I may not be able to convince an engineer of your stature.
Thanks
Regards
Eng Suraj Singh PE
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:26 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:26 pmPost subject: No Title |
|
|
sikandarsiddiqi@yahoo.comwrote:
SEFI offers you a whole new dimension for approaching issues of concern. Whenever you need quality inputs, the combined resource of SEFI members would be a useful sounding board - SEFI
In GOD we trust - Pardon us - Help us Lord - You are the Omnipotent
IMPORTANT
DearAll, > Bangladesh,India & World Wide
Hope you are well by the Grace of Almighty.
You will shortly be receiving South Asian Quake &Tsunami Wave Technical Information Special in color & graphics. With regards.
Engr.Sikandar Hayat Siddiqi Project & Seismic Design Management Engineer & Project Co-ordinator,Earthquake Anti-disaster Defence Management System Initiative (EADMSI) & Director, EADMSI Data Processing Center Dhaka - Bangladesh/Asia Radio Link International E-mail
---------------------------------
Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more.
---------------------------------
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Youcannotpost new topics in this forum Youcannotreply to topics in this forum Youcannotedit your posts in this forum Youcannotdelete your posts in this forum Youcannotvote in polls in this forum Youcanattach files in this forum Youcandownload files in this forum
|
|
|