View previous topic::View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shailesh.trivedi at ba... Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 5:57 amPost subject: Licensing issues |
 |
|
Dear Mr. Kadam,
Your concern for junior people is appreciated. But what do we call donkeywork? Is there a substitute to hard work if one wants to excel professionally? Wisdom, intelligence and vision do not come embedded with degree certificates nor do they ooze out of classroom benches!
Use of "cheap man-power" is a reality even without having PE's around! Having PE's will in fact solve this if employers take an initiative to structure training programmes and 'catch them young'. With the system of licensing in place, there will be a need for structured training programmes on the job to lead the new generation engineers to achieve the PE status. 这将提高就业市场,迫使organizations to "invest in people". The serious young engineers will then choose employers based up on the mentoring and training offered on the job. If there is a will, the details will emerge as we go ahead with licensing. I note Arvind's post: "All training institutions / Educational Institutions are producing good trained manpower who can manouver through the software but lack the feel of structure. In fact they are producing people who only know how to operate the so called sofisticated softwares. In this case it is must that young engineers should 曾在PE最低一段7是的rs as suggested by Sri P Srinivasan and should be incarporated in the Draft Engineer's Bill."
Beyond the numbers game and the sophisticated tools, a competent engineer should possess the following: * "feel" for structures and a thorough understanding of first principles. (primary requirements for solutions of complex problems) * enthusiasm to innovate and improve. (required for continuous learning to keep in pace with changes in technology and society) * ability to articulate ideas. (required for communicating effectively as an engineer and as a responsible member of the society) These qualities can be developed by working under senior mentors (PE's) with a training programme structured with predefined objectives. Will this not be the first step towards reversing the 'brain-drain'? With regards, Shailesh
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Shailesh Trivedi Technical Director Babtie Consultants (India) Pvt. Ltd. 83, New York Tower - A, Thaltej Cross Roads, Thaltej, Ahmedabad - 380 054 INDIA Tel. +91 - 79 - 685 5636 Fax +91 - 79 - 684 3527
-----Original Message----- From:p_kadam_sefi@yahoo.co.in[mailto:p_kadam_sefi@yahoo.co.in] Sent: 27 March 2003 14:23 To:shailesh.trivedi@babtieindia.com Subject: [ECONF] Re: [ECONF] Re: [ECONF] Re: [ECONF] [ECONF] Licensing issues
****************************************** e-Conference on ``Licensing Issues in Structural Engineering profession in the Indian context`` organised by Structural Engineers Forum of India (//www.buonovino.com) under the aegis of Babtie Technical Assistance Team as a part of the ADB Technical Assistance Project for Capacity Building for Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction and Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority ****************************************** Dear all, Working with PEs may not help if juniors are treated as a cheap manpower & given only donkey work regards, P Kadam
eondes@sify.com wrote ****************************************** e-Conference on ``Licensing Issues in Structural Engineering profession in the Indian context`` organised by Structural Engineers Forum of India (//www.buonovino.com) under the aegis of Babtie Technical Assistance Team as a part of the ADB Technical Assistance Project for Capacity Building for Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction and Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority ****************************************** Dear Dr. A R Chandrasekaran
Thanks for joining.
In fact you have a point, but my experience is contrary. All training institutions / Educational Institutions are producing good trained manpower who can manouver through the software but lack the feel of structure. In fact they are producing people who only know how to operate the so called sofisticated softwares. In this case it is must that young engineers should 曾在PE最低一段7是的rs as suggested by Sri P Srinivasan and should be incarporated in the Draft Engineer's Bill.
Also my experience is that even M Tech students from very good premier institutions lack this basic knowledge.
But as you said we should encourage them as they are the furure PEs and we should do every possible way to keep loosing them to Software Market!
With warm regards.
Arvind
---------------------------------------------------------- Arvind Jaiswal Chief Consulting Engineer, EON DESIGNERS, Architects, Consulting Engineers & Interior Designers, 35-B, Vasavi Colony, Behind Vikrampuri, Secunderabad-500 015 Ph. 040-27847847, 27722618 Mobitel 040-56640202
******************************************* The views, opinions, analyses and assessments contained herein do not necessarily reflect the views of SEFI and the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Directors or the governments they represent.
SEFI and the Asian Development Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in the proceedings of this e-conference and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. ******************************************* To make a posting to the e-conference, please send email to econf@www.buonovino.com ******************************************* To unsubscribe, please send an email tounsubscribe-econf@www.buonovino.com *******************************************
========powered by Reach1to1 Office Everywhere (http://www.reach1to1.com)======
Posted via Email |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Youcannotpost new topics in this forum Youcannotreply to topics in this forum Youcannotedit your posts in this forum Youcannotdelete your posts in this forum Youcannotvote in polls in this forum Youcanattach files in this forum Youcandownload files in this forum
|
|
|