inchak at tatasteel.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:52 amPost subject: Message No 65 Guaranteed min & Max strength of rebar |
|
|
亲爱的阿尔芭女士Sheth I have a few observations on the clarification provided by you (vide Message No 65 Re: Guaranteed min & Max strength of rebar) I quote your response and add my observations below each point.
a) Most times, fy in Fe 415 or Fe500 is not 415 or 500 but much higher. Typically Fe 415 steel has fy between 430 to 470. Ditto for Fe500. My response: At present the IS 1786 stipulates only minimum YS for different grades. the actual values can be and normally is much higher with a wide variation. In last couple of years we have checked some 257 samples collected from market. The highest YS we got was 788 MPa(!). 26 samples had YS 600MPa or more, of which 5 had YS above 700 MPa. Minimum was of course 416 MPa if we ignore some 57 samples with YS below 415 MPa and therefore not compliant to IS 1786. Under such circumstances " fy between 430 to 470" may not be a valid assumption.
b) Additionally, Steel can take upto 1.25fy due to stain hardening My response: This is not correct to assume without a qualifier that "Steel can take upto 1.25fy due to strain hardening" . Actually the ability of the steel to strain harden is accurately reflected by the UTS value. If the UTS is 10% higher than YS (IS 1786 today!) then you can expect only 10% strain hardening before fracture. This is why Mr. Neelkanth D Joshi is rightly advocating UTS/YS ratio of 1.25 (vide Message No 66 ).
You would have noticed that in the Super Ductile bars (vide Message No 30) we have tried to increase the UTS/YS ratio to 1.20 and also put a cap on YS to 550 Mpa and on UTS as 50% higher than YS. The actual numbers can be further tailored to the actual needs of the Structural Engineers
Surely the matter is important enough to merit a threadbare discussion and resolution. May be we have to have a fresh look at the codes. Any idea how this point is addressed by the codes of the other countries? You may be a better expert to lead the debate and bring it to a logical conclusion because I am not knowledgeable enough on the finer aspects of structural Engineering Design. Regards, Indranil Chakrabarti
********************************DISCLAIMER*********************************** Information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is confidential and proprietary to Tata Steel Ltd. and is intended for use only by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient , you are notified that any dissemination or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and you are requested to delete this e-mail immediately and notify the originator. Tata Steel does not enter into any binding agreement with any party by e-mail. Any views expressed by an individual do not necessarily reflect the view of Tata Steel. Tata Steel is not responsible for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of information provided. While this e-mail has been checked for all known viruses the addressee should also scan for viruses. To know more about Tata Steel please visitwww.tatasteel.com ********************************************************************************
Posted via Email |
|