View previous topic::View next topic |
Author |
Message |
manoj_pillai General Sponsor
Joined: 08 Mar 2018 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 1:58 pmPost subject: COOLING TOWER WIND LOAD CALCULATION |
|
|
what is the value of Cf ( force coefficient ) for cooling tower? referring to IS 875:2015 CLAUSE 7.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
N. Prabhakar General Sponsor
Joined: 25 Apr 2009 Posts: 474
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 5:41 amPost subject: |
|
|
Dear Er. Manoj Pillai,
For the design of Natural Draft Cooling Tower, Force coefficientCfis not used to calculate wind pressure on the tower. For wind pressure calculation on the tower, please follow the procedure given in IS: 11504, considering varying wind pressure along the circumference (using Fourier coefficients), and along height as per IS: 875 -2015.
I am attaching a Technical Paper, authored by me, which may help you to understand on the subject matter.
With best wishes,
n .角色BE CEng(I) MIStructE (UK) MIE (Ind) Chartered Structural Engineer Vasai (E), Pin 401 208 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
manoj_pillai General Sponsor
Joined: 08 Mar 2018 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 4:50 amPost subject: WIND CALCULATION FOR COOLING TOWER |
|
|
N. Prabhakar wrote: |
Dear Er. Manoj Pillai,
For the design of Natural Draft Cooling Tower, Force coefficientCfis not used to calculate wind pressure on the tower. For wind pressure calculation on the tower, please follow the procedure given in IS: 11504, considering varying wind pressure along the circumference (using Fourier coefficients), and along height as per IS: 875 -2015.
I am attaching a Technical Paper, authored by me, which may help you to understand on the subject matter.
With best wishes,
n .角色BE CEng(I) MIStructE (UK) MIE (Ind) Chartered Structural Engineer Vasai (E), Pin 401 208 |
Dear Sir, 我的冷却塔是115米高。和是11504 - 1985(page 7, clause 5.1.3 and amendment no.1 October 1988) states that it cannot be applicable for above 100 m. i have calculated gust factors but how to calculate the pressure Is the formula mentioned below CORRECT ? F= (Ce-Ci) x G x Ae x Pz
and how to calculate Ae ( frontal area) is the value 1 for it ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
manoj_pillai General Sponsor
Joined: 08 Mar 2018 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 3:14 pmPost subject: wind load |
|
|
Dear Sir, I have done following steps for calculating the wind load on natural draft cooling tower. 1) I have also calculated Wind pressure pd as per IS 875 2) as per IS 875 I have calculated Gust factors. 3) as per IS 11504 I have calculated the circumferential values of wind
howto apply andwhatto apply (I dont know the formula)on cooling tower elements ?
Kindly help me please. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
abhio ...
Joined: 08 Mar 2010 Posts: 545
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2018 4:52 amPost subject: |
|
|
Dear Er Pillai,
Wind pressure calculated is to be applied to each element of the model according to the circumferential location of the element and its height above ground level.
Regards,
A S Oundhakar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
manoj_pillai General Sponsor
Joined: 08 Mar 2018 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2018 1:00 pmPost subject: WIND LOAD |
|
|
so we dont have to calculate gust ?
pressure on each pate = circumferential coefficent x pressure from IS 875(Pz)
Is it right sir ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
N. Prabhakar General Sponsor
Joined: 25 Apr 2009 Posts: 474
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 6:49 amPost subject: |
|
|
Dear Er. Manoj Pillai,
By the way you are asking questions, you don't seem to have read my Technical paper Which I had posted on 2nd April 2018.
N.D. Cooling towers are not just simple cantilever type structures, and they are very large size 3-D type shell structures requiring finite element method of analysis, and design with clear understanding of their structural behaviour. In India, very few consulting and contracting firms, specialised in this type of structures, are doing the design and construction.
Unless you are doing the design in one of these specilaised firms where you would get certainly guidance from seniors in the firm, you would get the right experience over the years. If you are doing for the sake of an academic interest, it would be of no use.
With best wishes,
N. Prabhakar |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|