www.半岛软件下载www.buonovino.com

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptionsDigestDigest PreferencesFAQFAQSearchSearchMemberlistMemberlistUsergroupsUsergroupsRegisterRegisterFAQ安全提示FAQDonate
ProfileProfileLog in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messagesLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

pile weight

这s forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.这s topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. www.半岛软件下载www.buonovino.comForum Index->Past Discussions Year 2007
View previous topic::View next topic
Author Message
arunkumarjain11
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 2

Post发布:2007年太阳10月14日12点Post subject: pile weight Reply with quote

It would depend whether you are estimating the pile capacity under compression or tension. It would be more appropriate to consider normal weight of pile if pile is under compression and buoyant weight if pile is under tension, especially when there is a possibility of fluctuation in the water table. However, if certain portion of pile always remains submerged, it would be appropriate to use buoyant weight of pile for the portion of pile, which always remains under water.

(A.K. Jain)

lele_raj[AT]yah... wrote:
hi virol,

it's very common to deduct unit weight of water in case of submerged footing. it's applied to all sorts of footings, not only piles. example: a "pad and chimney" type footing for a HV transmission tower where water table is likely to rise upto ground level.

Best regards,

Rajendra (Raj) Lele

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail or any attachment/s.

----- Original Message ----
Message From "nishithkshah[AT]yah..."
To: lele_raj[AT]yah...
Sent: Sunday, 9 September, 2007 11:14:18 PM
Subject: pile weight

hello ,viral

this is correct because ,any thing which is under water would have an upward force which we know has buoyancy .because the half the portion of pile is submerged there is force equal to that of water being pushed due to presence of pile , &will reduce the weight or self weight.

viralcivileng[AT]yah... wrote: Hi friends,
this is Viral.
I came across one problem.
Is there any logic to reduce the self weight of the portion of pile which is submerged?
I found in one design that they have calculated submerged weight of pile which is partly under water. I couldn't understand this logic. How this weight will be less than dry condition like that in soil? They had just subtracted unit weight of water from that of concrete and then calculated weight. Is this wright? If yes then why? If no then also why?

Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know how.

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now

Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html

Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online. Click here.

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:
这s forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.这s topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. www.半岛软件下载www.buonovino.comForum Index->Past Discussions Year 2007 All times are GMT
Page1of1



Jump to:
Youcannotpost new topics in this forum
Youcannotreply to topics in this forum
Youcannotedit your posts in this forum
Youcannotdelete your posts in this forum
Youcannotvote in polls in this forum
Youcanattach files in this forum
Youcandownload files in this forum


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA,Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service.advertisement policy
Baidu
map